Shaping Sustainable markets
Shaping Sustainable Markets is a research initiative that explores how the formal and informal rules used to govern markets – called market governance mechanisms (MGMs) – are designed, and how they impact on people, the planet and the economy.
Examples of MGMs include fairtrade certification and payments for ecosystem services, but there are many others, including market-based instruments and innovative laws and policies. These mechanisms are not equally effective. Through research we identify which mechanisms are working well, and which are not, and we offer lessons on how their design and implementation might be improved.
What we do
While all market governance mechanisms — from carbon labelling to diamond certification — aim to improve the contribution of markets to sustainable development, they can have unintended consequences.
Carbon labelling, for example, because of the way in which its measurement system is designed, can inadvertently discriminate against small producers in developing countries – and thereby exacerbate poverty. We shed light on whether these mechanisms meet their aims and any unforeseen impacts they might have. We:
- analyse a wide range of mechanisms to explore their impact on sustainable development
- assess both the individual and combined impact of these mechanisms, and
- generate ideas of innovative mechanisms that have yet to be tested in the real world – providing new ideas for 'shaping' markets.
Our ultimate objective is to improve how market governance mechanisms are designed.
Over time we hope to build a set of principles to guide policymakers in designing and implementing effective mechanisms.
Whether you are a business professional, policymaker or researcher, our results will help you in your work.
How we do it
We analyse existing literature and carry out primary research to assess the impacts of a range of mechanisms on sustainable development. What impact do these mechanisms have on society, the environment and the economy? Do they help to alleviate poverty and maintain or enhance the environment?
We also question how these mechanisms are designed and implemented. Are they effective, efficient and equitable? And how does their design and implementation shape their impact on sustainable development? This will involve qualitative analysis using a set of questions we have developed ourselves.
We build on existing research to avoid replicating work, and aim to fill knowledge gaps where possible.
We’ve already carried out research into ISO 26000, collective trademarks, mechanisms that can be used to address the climate change impacts of agriculture, payments for ecosystem services and investment principles. Our latest research – carried out in partnership with Oxfam – explores the policies that can be used to tip agricultural investments and markets in favour of small-scale farmers.
FPIC and the extractive industries: a guide to applying the spirit of free, prior and informed consent in industrial projects
Publication, 01 March 2013
What's the catch? Lessons from and prospects for Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification in developing countries
Publication, 01 June 2015
Intellectual property tools for products based on biocultural heritage
Publication, 01 November 2011
Sustainability standards in China-Latin America trade and investment: A discussion
Publication, 01 May 2013
Investing for sustainable development? A review of investment principles, trends and impacts
Publication, 01 July 2011
Localising transparency: Exploring EITI’s contribution to sustainable development
Publication, 01 May 2014
The Indonesia Domestic Biogas Programme: can carbon financing promote sustainable agriculture?
Publication, 01 November 2015
Reforestation, carbon sequestration and agriculture: can carbon financing promote sustainable smallholder activities in Nicaragua?
Publication, 01 October 2015