Applying a human rights-based approach to conflicts over wildlife

Human-wildlife conflict remains a growing concern for the wellbeing of local communities and the conservation of biodiversity.

Wildlife and their management can pose direct and indirect threats to local communities. Moreover, the presence and behaviour of wildlife is often influenced by conservation and other resource management decisions in a landscape.

For example, the development of wildlife corridors, protected areas or infrastructure projects can affect where wildlife roam and how they interact with people. If close to villages, schools, fields or water sources, this can increase the risk to infrastructure or crop damage or attacks on people or livestock. The fear of being attacked can also affect a child’s access to education or a household’s access to food, income or water.

In conservation, these are often considered to be negative social and economic impacts on local communities. Yet, at times, they can result in the violation of people’s human rights, such as the right to a healthy and sustainable environment, food, housing or life.
 
Furthermore, decision-making related to wildlife and resource management rarely involves local communities. Not only is this an infringement of communities’ procedural rights, but it can also result in their alienation from conservation action.

Negative interactions with wildlife can therefore sometimes amplify social conflicts between local communities and those with differing conservation or land use priorities. These social conflicts can also result in communities engaging in activities that negatively impact conservation efforts, such as attempts at scaring away, poisoning or killing wildlife.

Recognising that negative social impacts associated with human-wildlife conflict can interfere with the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities will better enable communities to demand respect for their rights and encourage state and non-state duty-bearers to uphold their responsibilities.

What did IIED do?

Together with partners, IIED explored what it means to apply a human rights-based approach to human-wildlife conflict.

We collectively developed guidance for potential duty-bearers, including governments, conservation organisations and private businesses, to better identify their responsibilities towards Indigenous Peoples and local communities impacted by their land use and conservation decisions.