- (-) Remove monitoring and evaluation filter monitoring and evaluation
- (-) Remove Monitoring, evaluation and learning filter Monitoring, evaluation and learning
Search for monitoring and evaluation
Global indicators are important for understanding progress towards each of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, they can mask sub-national and thematic variations.
Methodologies for the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of adaptation are being developed and tested in a variety of programmes, government systems and climate finance institutions.
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of adaptation to climate change is~essential but is a young discipline, as yet with no universally agreed standards or practices for measuring how well an intervention reduces peoples’ climate vulnerab
Uganda’s reliance on natural resources renders its economy extremely vulnerable to climate change. This makes it essential to track progress on adaptation initiatives and ensure the whole country is on a path towards climate resilience.
Climate change adaptation has become a policy priority in most developing countries, despite limited resourcing.
The prize of better climate adaptation awaits nations that can evaluate their efforts at both national and local levels, so evidence from each scale can inform future plans and actions, say Simon Anderson, Irene Karani and Melq Gomes.
In this article by Karen Hillyer and Simone Purohit, the authors describe the evolution of a participatory monitoring and evaluation process in Bangalore, India, and the learning through trial and error that took place before a satisfact
In this article, Chris Lunch discusses how two methods – participatory video (PV) and Most Significant Change (MSC) – can be combined in a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) process.