![]() |
||||||||||
IIED Links: |
|
Forestry: |
Related Links: |
||||
|
|
Indian forestry has been changing over the last decade. The new national forest policy of 1988 and the economic liberalisation programme, which started in 1991, have completely reversed the earlier commercial orientation of forest management to an emphasis on conservation and meeting the subsistence needs of forest-dependent communities. Forest-based industries, used to getting subsidised raw material supplies from government forests, are now expected to meet their needs from non-forest lands by establishing a direct relationship with farmers. In addition, economic liberalisation has exposed the industry to international competition. The role of the government, which controls most forest lands, has also undergone a significant change. It is now widely recognised that the government alone cannot ensure that forests are sustainably managed, that they provide the goods and services that are demanded of them, and most importantly, that the livelihoods of those dependent on forests are assured and sustainable. Consequently, local communities are being involved in the protection and management of government forests through the Joint Forest Management (JFM) programme, which started on a pilot scale in the early 1990s and has now spread to over 15% of forest lands. The New Foresters: The role of private enterprise in the Indian forestry sector focuses on the forest resource and the key players – specifically the corporate private sector, farmers, and communities. It analyses the pattern of investment in the forestry sector and scenarios of demand and supply. The specific areas studied are the forest product-based traditional medicine industry, farm forestry and corporate support for it, commercialisation of joint forest management, and the private sector’s involvement in policy development. The report and substudies highlight the growing realisation that to effectively address the key challenges facing the sector, i.e. continuing forest degradation, the increasing demand-supply gap, and the current paucity of investment, the private sector should be encouraged to play a greater role than it has hitherto played. Whilst the private sector is already a key player, its potential role in achieving sustainable forestry can be enhanced by removing existing bottlenecks and providing some positive incentives. Company–farmer partnership schemes have demonstrated the potential of farmers participating in such schemes to produce timber for industry and to sell in the open market. These schemes have clearly contributed to the expansion of farm forestry, but both companies and farmers are at the mercy of a potentially volatile and risky market. Recommendations include:
Research and development has emerged as an area where the corporate private sector has a real and demonstrated comparative advantage. Great progress has been made in the development of new clones for which farmers and, in some cases, Forest Development Corporations are prepared to pay a premium. Recommendations include:
Commercial plantations. A large area under plantation is currently being managed by the Forest Development Corporations but both productivity and incentives for improving plantations are low. Recommendations include:
Forestry investment is currently inadequate, although recent collective investment enterprises have demonstrated considerable potential (somewhat marred by the subsequent collapse of most schemes). Recommendations include:
Farm forestry. Experience in the 1970s and 80s paves the way for a number of measures that could significantly enhance the potential of individual farmers in certain regions of India to both increase farm-based contributions to industrial wood supply, and improve their own livelihoods. Recommendations include:
Market information is key: the availability of market and remunerative prices are likely to be major factors in determining the future of farm forestry. It is recommended that:
Joint Forest Management has expanded greatly over the last decade and has demonstrated the potential for communities to take responsibility for managing their forest areas. The focus has been on the management and sharing of largely subsistence benefits. However, production from certain areas under JFM is on the verge of becoming highly commercial. Recommendations include:
Ayurvedic medicine industry. Given this large industry’s unorganised nature, obtaining reliable information is difficult, yet there is a widely recognised crisis in the supply of ayurvedic herbs and unsustainable and destructive extraction has been widely reported. Recommendations include:
In conclusion, the challenges facing the sector are too great for the forest bureaucracy to handle alone. A loosening of bureaucratic control is crucial for the private sector to contribute more effectively. There is also a need to promote transparency and curb the corruption that plagues forestry, like most other sectors in the country. If the outline recommendations are developed and acted upon, not only can the private sector meet India's forest produce requirements but it could also allow the country to emerge as a major exporter and world player in forestry. Copyright © 2005 International Institute for Environment and Development. |
Forestry Home About
Us Research Themes Forestry
Publications Partners Links Forestry
Staff Contact Forestry
|
|||||
|